Comments on: Metro forming sounding board in Shoreline/North Seattle

By: Waiting for Metro

Waiting for Metro — Fri, 08 Feb 2013 02:09:37 +0000

1) Why no Metro responses to the comments in OCT. 2012?
2) What will the RR E Line provide that running the #358 more often and longer wouldn’t? In other words, how does Metro justify spending all that money for almost the same service?

By: Underserved rider

Underserved rider — Sun, 21 Oct 2012 21:29:06 +0000

So Shoreline gets served but not Lake City??! Lake City needs better connections and better service along Lake City Way–not the limited stops, few and far between, of the #522, or the long-and-winding routes of the #72 & 41.

And, people need to be able to go East-West as well and to connect with North-South lines further west.

By: Bob Keller

Bob Keller — Wed, 10 Oct 2012 17:39:55 +0000

Will the E line attempt to match arrival/departure times with the Swift at Aurora Village P&R? At least will the E line frequency in both directions be identical?

By: rapidride

rapidride — Fri, 14 Sep 2012 19:03:14 +0000

Metro has no plans to extend the D Line. It may be worth checking out Route 40, which connects Ballard, Whittier Heights (the D Line terminal), Aurora Avenue, and Northgate.

By: Russell

Russell — Fri, 14 Sep 2012 03:15:01 +0000

Will the RapidRide D line be extended the 0.8 mile from the current north end to connect with the new RapidRide E line at Aurora & N 105th St?

Is that in the current plan? If yes does it have a rough time-frame?